Commentary on "Somatrogon in pediatric growth hormone deficiency: a comprehensive review of clinical trials and real-world considerations"

Article information

Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2025;30(1):1-2
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 February 28
doi : https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2524129edi01
1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Pediatric Center, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea
2Department of Pediatrics, Chungnam National University, College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
Address for correspondence: Yoo-Mi Kim Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Center, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, 20, Bodeum 7-ro, Sejong, 30099, Korea Email: ym.kim@cnu.ac.kr

The treatment of pediatric endocrinologic disorders often extends throughout childhood, and repeated dosing over a long period can be a major burden for patients and their caregivers. As a result, strategies to extend the half-life of drugs to increase the interval between doses are being actively explored. Technological innovations in long-acting drugs have recently gained traction in the treatment of pediatric endocrinologic disorders to reduce the frequency of injections.

In pediatric diabetes, long-acting insulin formulations such as insulin degludec have improved glycemic control stability as the longest-acting insulin analog while allowing for mixing with other formulations [1,2]. The introduction of 3-month and 6-month formulations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of central precocious puberty has helped overcome the challenge of maintaining a strict dosing schedule every 4 weeks, greatly reducing the burden on patients and caregivers during long-term treatment [3].

For inherited metabolic disorders such as Fabry disease, enzyme replacement therapy, which has traditionally been administered every 2 weeks, is undergoing clinical trials to extend the half-life through pegylation, increasing the dosing interval to every 4 weeks. This adjustment is expected to positively impact treatment adherence by reducing the stress of frequent hospital visits and injections [4]. As such, the strategy of extending drug half-life is not merely a pharmacologic improvement; it is directly related to enhancing patient care and the overall treatment experience.

The field of growth hormone (GH) therapy has been exploring the transition from daily to long-acting formulations, with somatrogon as a notable example [5,6]. Maniatis et al. [7] reviewed the clinical significance and prospects of the latest long-acting formulations, focusing on clinical trials of somatrogon, which demonstrated noninferior efficacy compared to daily somatropin. Somatrogon, a long-acting GH analog, is an alternative treatment for pediatric GH deficiency (pGHD). It is engineered by fusing human GH with 3 copies of the carboxyl-terminal peptide from the β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin, resulting in a 47.5-kDa molecule [5,6]. Administered once weekly at a dose of 0.66 mg/kg/wk, it has demonstrated significant height gain comparable to daily GH therapy in global phase II, phase III, and Japanese phase III trials [8-10]. A preclinical comparison study showed similar height velocity (HV) between somatrogon (0.66 mg/kg/wk) and somatropin (0.24 mg/kg/wk), with values of 11.9±3.5 cm/yr and 12.5±2.1 cm/yr, respectively [8]. The global phase III trial also showed an HV of 10.1 cm/ yr after 12 months for somatrogon, compared to an HV of 9.78 cm/yr for somatropin (0.24 mg/kg/wk) in pGHD [9]. The Japanese phase III trial reported a higher HV for somatrogon (9.65 cm/yr) compared to 7.87 cm/yr for somatropin (0.175 mg/kg/wk) [10]. An extension study demonstrated an improvement in height standard deviation score (SDS) from -3.98 to -0.69 after 4 years of somatrogon treatment in pGHD patients [11]. Despite a higher prevalence of injection site pain compared to conventional treatment, a crossover phase III trial reported significantly lower life interference scores (8.63) after switching to somatrogon, compared to previous scores of 24.13 during somatropin treatment [12].

These clinical trials have demonstrated that somatrogon achieves comparable results in key clinical endpoints, including growth-promoting effectiveness, safety, and tolerability, while offering the advantage of once-weekly administration [8-12]. This suggests that treatment efficacy is maintained while improving patient convenience, thereby increasing its potential for practical use in clinical settings.

Although the efficacy and safety profile of somatrogon appears promising, Insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels fluctuate over time, necessitating standardized monitoring. Measuring IGF-1 levels on day 4 postadministration is essential for assessing the efficacy and safety of somatrogon [5-7].

The long-term effects of somatrogon, particularly in comparison to daily somatropin, require further investigation to assess both efficacy and potential safety concerns over prolonged use. Answering these questions will require large-scale cohort surveillance studies, similar to the Kabi International Growth Study [13], the Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study [14], and the LG Growth Study in Korea [15].

Maniatis et al. [7] reviewed recent clinical trials evaluating somatrogon for pGHD, demonstrating its noninferior outcomes in height SDS, IGF-1 SDS, and safety compared to daily GH therapy.

This once-weekly formulation offers a viable alternative to daily treatment while significantly alleviating the burden of frequent injections for both patients and caregivers. As technological advancements continue, long-acting formulations with extended half-life are expected to revolutionize treatment approaches across various pediatric endocrinologic and metabolic disorders, paving the way for more patient-centered and personalized care. However, long-term safety and efficacy must be evaluated through large-scale cohort studies to ensure the optimal integration of these therapies into clinical practice.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

1. Hirsch IB, Juneja R, Beals JM, Antalis CJ, Wright EE. The evolution of insulin and how it informs therapy and treatment choices. Endocr Rev 2020;41:733–55.
2. Seo JY, Lee CG, Choi H, Lee HK, Lee SY, Kim HJ, et al. Effects of once-weekly dulaglutide on juvenile type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in Korea: a pilot study. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2023;28:296–301.
3. Kim SJ, Kim JH, Hong YH, Chung IH, Lee EB, Kang E, et al. 2022 Clinical practice guidelines for central precocious puberty of Korean children and adolescents. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2023;28:168–77.
4. Holida M, Linhart A, Pisani A, Longo N, Eyskens F, Goker-Alpan O, et al. A phase III, open-label clinical trial evaluating pegunigalsidase alfa administered every 4 weeks in adults with Fabry disease previously treated with other enzyme replacement therapies. J Inherit Metab Dis 2025;48e12795.
5. Hasegawa Y, Ikegawa K, Mitani-Konno M, Ariyasu D, Amano N. Current understanding and perspectives on growth and long-acting GH therapy in Japan. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2025;34:1–12.
6. Grillo MS, Frank J, Saenger P. Long-acting growth hormone (LAGH), an update. Front Pediatr 2023;11:1254231.
7. Maniatis AK, Wajnrajch MP, Thomas M, Chung SB, Lee J. Somatrogon in pediatric growth hormone deficiency: a comprehensive review of clinical trials and real-world considerations. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2025;30:11–6.
8. Zelinska N, Iotova V, Skorodok J, Malievsky O, Peterkova V, Samsonova L, et al. Long-acting C-terminal peptide-modified hGH (MOD-4023): results of a safety and dose-finding study in GHD children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102:1578–87.
9. Deal CL, Steelman J, Vlachopapadopoulou E, Stawerska R, Silverman LA, Phillip M, et al. Efficacy and safety of weekly somatrogon vs daily somatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency: a phase 3 study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022;107:e2717–28.
10. Horikawa R, Tanaka T, Hasegawa Y, Yorifuji T, Ng D, Rosenfeld RG, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon compared with once-daily somatropin (Genotropin(R)) in Japanese children with pediatric growth hormone deficiency: results from a randomized phase 3 study. Horm Res Paediatr 2022;95:275–85.
11. Zadik Z, Zelinska N, Iotova V, Skorodok Y, Malievsky O, Mauras N, et al. An open-label extension of a phase 2 dose-finding study of once-weekly somatrogon vs. once-daily Genotropin in children with short stature due to growth hormone deficiency: results following 5 years of treatment. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2023;36:261–9.
12. Maniatis AK, Carakushansky M, Galcheva S, Prakasam G, Fox LA, Dankovcikova A, et al. Treatment burden of weekly somatrogon vs daily somatropin in children with growth hormone deficiency: a randomized study. J Endocr Soc 2022;6:bvac117.
13. Geffner ME, Ranke MB, Wajnrajch MP, ; Pfizer International Growth Database Strategic Executive Committee, Strategic Advisory Board, and International Board. An overview of growth hormone therapy in pediatric cases documented in the Kabi International Growth Study (Pfizer International Growth Database). Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2024;29:3–11.
14. Pfäffle R, Land C, Schönau E, Holterhus PM, Ross JL, Piras de Oliveira C, et al. Growth hormone treatment for short stature in the USA, Germany and France: 15 years of surveillance in the genetics and neuroendocrinology of short-stature international study (GeNeSIS). Horm Res Paediatr 2018;90:169–80.
15. Rhie YJ, Yoo JH, Choi JH, Chae HW, Kim JH, Chung S, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of growth hormone therapy in Korean children with growth disorders: 5-year results of LG Growth Study. PLoS One 2019;14e0216927.

Article information Continued