Age of menarche and final height in patients with permanent congenital hypothyroidism

Article information

Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2024;29(6):371-378
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 December 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2448014.007
1School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2Metabolic Liver Disease Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3Imam Hossein Children's Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Address for correspondence: Mahin Hashemipour Metabolic Liver Disease Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan Iran Email: hashemipour@med.mui.ac.ir
Address for co-correspondence: Silva Hovsepian Metabolic Liver Disease Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Email: s.hovsepian@res.mui.ac.ir or silvahovsepsecret@gmail.com
Received 2024 January 22; Revised 2024 August 19; Accepted 2024 August 28.

Abstract

Purpose

We compared the age at menarche and standard deviation score (SDS) of final height (FH) in permanent congenital hypothyroidism (CH) patients with those of healthy female adolescents and assessed their associations with CH screening-related variables or demographic factors.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we included 207 female CH patients and 598 healthy age-matched female adolescents. Ages at puberty onset and menarche, height at puberty and menarche, and the FH and its SDS were evaluated in the 2 groups and compared. Associations between screening variables and anthropometric data with age at menarche and SDS of FH were also assessed in CH patients.

Results

In the included population, 113 patients with CH and 453 healthy girls attained their FH. The mean ages at puberty onset and menarche in CH patients were higher than those in the healthy population (P<0.05). The mean height at menarche and the FH and its SDS were not different between the 2 groups (P>0.05). There was no significant association between FH SDS in CH patients and age of treatment (P=0.30). Age at menarche was significantly higher in CH patients with delayed age at treatment initiation (P=0.04). The difference between FH and target height was not significantly different among CH patients (P=0.83).

Conclusions

While CH patients had a significantly higher age at menarche compared to the healthy population, appropriate treatment changed this age to be similar to that in the healthy group. However, CH patients who experienced delayed treatment had a higher age at menarche. Age at treatment initiation was the only screening-related variable related to age at onset of menarche and puberty.

Highlights

· Female patients with permanent congenital hypothyroidism (PCH) experienced a later age at menarche delayed treatment in PCH patients was associated with a later age at menarche.

· The age at treatment initiation was identified as the only screening factor influencing the timing of menarche and puberty onset in female PCH patients.

Introduction

Thyroid hormones are required for proper growth and development, as well as mental health [1]. In neonates, lack or abnormal function of thyroid hormones can result in developmental delays if not identified through congenital hypothyroidism (CH) screening and treated with levothyroxine [2,3].

Following the initiation of CH screening in 1970 and its adoption in almost all countries worldwide, several studies evaluated the efficacy of treatment or the impact of age at treatment in the growth and development of CH patients [4-7].

Most studies have reported that early detection and treatment of CH neonates lead to normal growth and development [6]. Longitudinal studies of large samples of CH patients in our region also showed that early initiation of treatment with appropriate levothyroxine doses can result in normal growth in CH patients [8-10].

Although there is a substantial amount of research covering growth in congenital CH patients, findings regarding the effectiveness of treatments on final height (FH) or timing of puberty in CH patients remain controversial [11-14]. Some investigators found no associations of screening and treatment variables with FH or age at menarche [11-13], while identified associations [14-16]. However, improving CH screening programs or management to reduce associated complications is an important and challenging issue for healthcare professionals [17].

Findings from CH screening programs in Iran have indicated a greater prevalence of CH in this region compared to other populations [18]. Furthermore, there appear to be some differences in the etiology of CH, with a predominance of thyroid dyshormonogenesis, distinct from the findings reported in most global studies [19]. In this region of the world, parental consanguinity or the genetic background of the population has been suggested as the main risk factor for CH [19].

Growth parameters, particularly FH and age at menarche, are important in screening and management systems for CH, as well as for identifying associated factors and considering the conflicting findings reported in this field. Based on that, the present study compared the age at menarche and the FH standard deviation score (SDS) between CH patients and healthy female adolescents in Isfahan province of Iran. Additionally, this study sought to determine associations between these growth parameters and CH screening-related variables or demographic factors among patients.

Materials and methods

1. Study design and population

In this cross-sectional study, we included a matched group of female CH patients and healthy adolescent females who recently entered puberty. The study was conducted in the city of Isfahan, Iran in 2022.

In this study, females with permanent CH who were referred to the Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, endocrine clinics of Imam Hossien Children's Hospital, or pediatric endocrinologists of Isfahan City for their annual follow-ups were included.

To select patients, all female patients with permanent CH diagnosed at >6 years of age were assessed for signs of puberty. If the onset of menarche (first menstrual period) had occurred, the related age was recorded. Additionally, information related to growth parameters was evaluated.

Individuals with missing data or lack of cooperation were excluded from this study. In addition, among CH patients, those who did not use medication for >6 months, those with transient CH, those with inappropriate follow-up, those in whom treatment initiation occurred >90 days after birth, and those with chronic disease or genetic syndromes were also excluded from the study.

The healthy population included female schoolchildren selected from different schools in Isfahan City using a random-cluster multistage sampling method, with a probability proportional to their size. This approach was selected to obtain a representative sample of the target population of children and adolescents in the region.

Schoolchildren with known chronic diseases, such as hypertension, heart, kidney, endocrine, or pulmonary diseases; genetic diseases; severe short stature; or use of medications (such as growth hormones) that can affect growth were excluded.

Ages at puberty onset and menarche, heights at puberty onset and menarche, and the FH and its SDS were evaluated and compared in the 2 studied groups.

In CH patients, the associations of screening-related variables with age at menarche and FH were evaluated. These variables comprised age at diagnosis, age at treatment initiation and its classification (<14 days, appropriate; 15–45 days, acceptable; >45 days, delayed), levothyroxine dosage at baseline (10 or 15 μg/kg) (17), etiology of CH (dysgenesis or dyshormonogenesis), quality of treatment (frequency of thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH] level>10 IU/L during treatment in each year) during the first 3 years of life, and anthropometric data at baseline.

2. Ethics statement

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan Medical University (grant no. 3401312; code of ethics: IR.MUI.MED.REC.1401.278). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant or their parents after describing the aim and methods of the study. The authors had access to information that could identify individual participants during or after data collection.

3. Puberty

Age at puberty onset was defined by Tanner stage II breast development [20]. All participants were clinically examined by expert pediatric endocrinologists (MH and PK) for evaluation of puberty stage.

4. FH and target height assessment

Height was measured using a Seca Technologies (Hamburg, Germany) stadiometer (precision of 0.1 cm), with the child barefoot in light clothing with her head, shoulder blades, buttocks, and heels touching the board and her head in the Frankfurt plane. In this study, the FH was defined as the height when the growth velocity was <2 cm/yr calculated over a minimum of 9 months at a chronological age >16 years or bone age >15 years [21]. Target height (TH) was calculated as (mother's height + father's height)/2 ± 6.5 cm; this formula was devised by Tanner and is known as Tanner TH formula [22].

5. Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). The results for birth weight, birth height, height at puberty, height at menarche, and FH were presented as mean (standard deviation [SD]) and z-score with SD (SDS). Continuous and categorical variables are presented as mean±SD and number (%) and were compared in the 2 groups by Student t-test and the chi-square test, respectively. For variables with abnormal distribution, non-parametric tests were used. For correlation analysis, Pearson test was used.

The difference between FH and TH was calculated, and the children were divided into 2 groups of those with FH higher or lower than the TH. The variables related to CH screening were compared between these 2 groups. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In this study, 113 of 207 CH patients and 453 of 598 healthy female adolescents attained their FH. The mean±SD ages of the CH patients and the healthy group were 13.47 (3.20) and 13.82 (1.43) years, respectively (P>0.05) (data not shown).

Based on CH screening results, mean birth weight, birth height, and head circumference of the healthy population were 2,912.74±1,276.09 g, 48.05±15.02 cm, and 35.12±3.47 cm, respectively.

The mean±SD height and height z-scores in CH patients at 3 years of age were 98.8±5.7 cm and 0.82±1.74, respectively. In 5.7% and 14.7%, respectively, the height percentiles were <5% and >95%.

Table 1 presents the characteristics of patients with CH. Treatment was initiated within the first 45 days of life (i.e., appropriate or acceptable age for treatment initiation) in 96% of patients, with only 4% experiencing delayed treatment. The mean age at treatment initiation was 18.90±15.20 days. Parental consanguinity was reported in 38.6% of children with CH, and dyshormonogenesis was identified as the cause in 67% of the cases.

Characteristics of the congenital hypothyroidism patients

Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of the studied population in the 2 groups (female CH patients and healthy controls), focusing on ages at puberty onset and menarche, heights at puberty onset and menarche, and FH. The mean ages at puberty onset and menarche were significantly higher in CH patients compared to the healthy control group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of height at puberty onset, height at menarche, or FH (P>0.05).

Mean±standard deviation of age and height at puberty onset, age and height at menarche, and final height in female congenital hypothyroidism patients and healthy girls

Fig. 1 presents the z-scores for heights at puberty onset and menarche and the FH in the 2 study groups. There were no significant differences in these values between the groups (P>0.05).

Fig. 1.

The z-scores of heights at puberty onset and menarche and of final height (FH) in a healthy population and patients with congenital hypothyroidism.

Using Spearman correlation analysis, the association between age at menarche, age at puberty onset, and FH SDS with screening-related variables revealed no significant relationship between CH screening variables and the aforementioned factors (P>0.05). However, a significant association was found between birth weight and FH z-score (r=0.35, P=0.001). Significant associations were also found for height at puberty onset (r=0.69, P<0.001) and height at menarche (r=0.60, P<0.001) with the FH z-score (Table 3).

The correlation coefficients of age at menarche and final height SDS with screening-related variables in patients with congenital hypothyroidism

There was a significant association between age at menarche and age classification at treatment (P=0.04). The mean±SD ages at menarche in CH patients with appropriate, acceptable, and delayed age at treatment initiation, respectively, were 11.91±1.20, 12.34±1.30, and 13.20±1.64 years (P=0.07). Notably, this P-value was marginally significant. Meanwhile, the difference was significant between appropriate and delayed age at treatment initiation based on least significant difference post hoc tests (P<0.05).

The mean±SD TH in CH patients was 159.65±17.36 cm. The difference between FH and TH was not significantly different among CH patients (P=0.83) (data not shown).

Table 4 presents the baseline and screening characteristics of the CH patients who had an FH either above or below their TH. No significant differences were observed between the groups (P>0.05).

Characteristics of patients with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) regarding final height (FH) relative to target height (TH)

Discussion

In this study, we determined the FH SDS and age at menarche in adolescent girls with CH and compared the values with those of an age-matched healthy population. Our results showed that the FH SDS did not differ between groups. The age at menarche was significantly higher in CH patients with delayed age at treatment initiation compared to that in the healthy population. There was no significant association of CH screening and treatment variables with FH SDS and age at menarche.

Growth evaluation is an important issue in patients with CH due to the important role of thyroid hormones in this field. Evidence indicates that the first growth evaluation in CH patients was performed by Dickerman and De Vries [23] in 1997, who evaluated 30 patients with CH and found that only 17 of them had reached their FH.

We also assessed associations between growth parameters and screening-related variables in our CH population [8,9]. Heidari et al. [9] concluded that proper outcomes can be achieved through on-time treatment with an appropriate dose of levothyroxine. Notably, the studied populations in previous studies were all preschool-aged children with CH, while we included older CH patients in our investigation [8,9].

In 2001, Salerno et al. [11] evaluated age at menarche and FH in 45 patients (41 females) with CH. They reported that the menarche age (12.5±1.2 years) and FH of CH patients were similar to those of the healthy population. The studied variables were not associated with the etiology or severity of CH or the age at levothyroxine treatment initiation. Salerno et al. [11] suggested that proper screening and management of CH could lead to normal growth, and it was hypothesized that genetic factors most strongly influence final stature. Our results regarding the lack of association between the etiology of CH and both FH and TH were similar to those in their study.

Bain and Toublanc [14] also reported normal values for FH and age of puberty onset in patients with CH. They showed that younger age at initiation of levothyroxine treatment was associated with greater FH.

Delvecchio et al. [15] in Italy revealed that the mean age at puberty onset was 10.2 years in CH female patients, and that the FH was generally higher than the TH. These authors concluded that height at puberty onset is an important predictive factor for FH in CH patients. In their study, the FH in CH female patients was 161.7±0.9 cm, and its z-score was -0.10. The current study also found a significant association between height at puberty onset and FH.

Adachi et al. [12] in Japan investigated the FH SDS in 27 patients with CH (18 female) and reported an FH SDS of +0.17 (0.99) in the female population. They also showed that the etiology of CH and its severity, as well as levothyroxine dose, were not significantly associated with FH SDS, and that early diagnosis and treatment of patients with CH resulted in normal growth. Our results were similar to theirs.

Similarly, Lee et al. [13] in Korea reported an FH SDS of -0.11±1.09 for female CH patients, independent of CH etiology, initial TSH and T4 values, and age at treatment initiation. They emphasized the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of CH.

In a Brazilian study by Nesi-França et al. [16], the ages of onset of puberty and menarche in female CH patients were 9.7±1.2 and 12.1±1.1 years, respectively. They found that those with higher TSH levels during puberty tended to be older at menarche.

The findings of the current study regarding the similar FHs in the 2 studied groups and similar ages at menarche and puberty onset in CH patients with appropriate and acceptable ages of levothyroxine initiation were consistent with findings of previous reports from different countries. Patients with delayed age at treatment had higher ages at menarche and puberty onset. Considering that the FH was not different in the studied group, and that we found differences in ages at menarche and puberty onset only in those with delayed treatment initiation, in CH patients with appropriate management, height at puberty onset, duration of puberty, and height of parents could be the most important factors for FH prediction.

A recent clinical trial study by Esposito et al. [24] compared 2 doses of levothyroxine administration on the growth parameters in children with CH. However, these investigators showed that levothyroxine dose was not associated with growth parameters in these patients.

Most of the studies reported in this field are cross-sectional and retrospective, with few clinical or cohort studies available.

Our findings are similar to those reported recently by Lee et al. [13] in Korea, who found no significant difference between FH and TG of CH patients. Conversely, previous studies from France and Italy have reported higher FH than TH in CH patients [14,15]. Delvecchio et al. [15] reported that this trend is mainly due to FH increases in the Italian population during the last 2 decades and is not related to CH screening or management strategies. Bain and Toublanc [14] also reported higher FH than TH in CH patients, and they concluded that age at treatment initiation in CH patients is an important factor for TH [14]. However, more studies are needed to determine the key factors related to FH in this group of patients.

Given the high prevalence of CH in Iran [18], we recommend a related cohort study or development of a CH patient registry.

The main limitation of this study was that we did not conduct an assessment of bone age at puberty onset or menarche. The strength of this study is that the mentioned factors were evaluated in our region for the first time. As the CH population in this region has distinct characteristics concerning etiology and high consanguinity, the results of this study will be used as baseline information for future studies.

In conclusion, this study found that, while untreated CH patients had significantly higher ages at menarche compared to the healthy population, the age at menarche in properly managed CH patients was similar to that in the healthy group. However, CH patients who experienced delayed treatment had a higher age at menarche. This suggests that genetic factors and height at the onset of puberty are important factors associated with FH in this population. Additional studies are needed in this group of patients, including evaluation of bone age at puberty onset and of its association with FH.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

This study was funded by the Vice Chancellor of Research, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran, under the research project number 3401312.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy/ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author Contribution

Conceptualization: PK, SH, TA, HR, NM, MH; Data curation: PK, SH, TA, HR, NM, MH; Formal analysis: PK, SH, TA, HR, MH; Funding acquisition PK, SH, TA, HR, NM, MH; Methodology: PK, SH, TA, HR, NM, MH; Project administration: PK, SH, TA, HR, NM, MH; Visualization: PK, SH, TA, HR, NM, MH; Writing - original draft: PK, SH, TA, HR; Writing - review & editing: PK, SH, TA, HR, NM, MH

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge all patients and participants and the staff of Isfahan Endocrine and Metabolism Research Isfahan University of Medical Sciences for their cooperation. The authors acknowledge the receipt of resources and support from the Vice Chancellor of Research, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

References

1. Eng L, Lam L. Thyroid function during the fetal and neonatal periods. Neoreviews 2020;21:e30–6.
2. Léger J, Delcour C, Carel JC. Fetal and neonatal thyroid dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022;107:836–46.
3. Bowden SA, Goldis M. Congenital hypothyroidism. 2022 Jun 11. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; Jan–.
4. Nagasaki K, Minamitani K, Nakamura A, Kobayashi H, Numakura C, Itoh M, et al. Guidelines for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism (2021 revision). Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2023;32:26–51.
5. Cherella CE, Wassner AJ. Update on congenital hypothyroidism. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2020;27:63–9.
6. Soliman AT, Azzam S, Elawwa A, Saleem W, Sabt A. Linear growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of children with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening: a controlled study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2012;16:565–8.
7. Rahmani K, Yarahmadi S, Etemad K, Koosha A, Mehrabi Y, Aghang N, et al. Congenital hypothyroidism: optimal initial dosage and time of initiation of treatment: a systematic review. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2016;14e36080.
8. Feizi A, Hashemipour M, Hovsepian S, Amirkhani Z, Klishadi R, Rafee Al Hosseini M, et al. Study of the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in growth normalization of children with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Iran J Endocrinol Metab 2011;13:681–9.
9. Heidari Z, Feizi A, Hashemipour M, Kelishadi R, Amini M. Growth development in children with congenital hypothyroidism: the effect of screening and treatment variables-a comprehensive longitudinal study. Endocrine 2016;54:448–59.
10. Dalili S, Rezvani SM, Dalili H, Mohtasham Amiri Z, Mohammadi H, Abrisham Kesh S, et al. Congenital hypothyroidism: etiology and growth-development outcome. Acta Med Iran 2014;52:752–6.
11. Salerno M, Micillo M, Di Maio S, Capalbo D, Ferri P, Lettiero T, et al. Longitudinal growth, sexual maturation and final height in patients with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Eur J Endocrinol 2001;145:377–83.
12. Adachi M, Asakura Y, Tachibana K. Final height and pubertal growth in Japanese patients with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:698–703.
13. Lee J, Lee J, Lee DH. Final height of Korean patients with early treated congenital hypothyroidism. Korean J Pediatr 2018;61:221–5.
14. Bain P, Toublanc JE. Adult height in congenital hypothyroidism: prognostic factors and the importance of compliance with treatment. Horm Res 2002;58:136–42.
15. Delvecchio M, Salerno M, Acquafredda A, Zecchino C, Fico F, Manca F, et al. Factors predicting final height in early treated congenital hypothyroid patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2006;65:693–7.
16. Nesi-França S, Silveira RB, Rojas Ramos JCR, Cardoso-Demartini AA, Lima Cat MN, de Carvalho JAR, et al. Pubertal development and adult height in patients with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening in southern Brazil. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2020;33:1449–55.
17. Léger J, Olivieri A, Donaldson M, Torresani T, Krude H, van Vliet G, et al. European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology consensus guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and management of congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:363–84.
18. Hashemipour M, Hovsepian S, Kelishadi R, Iranpour R, Hadian R, Haghighi S, et al. Permanent and transient congenital hypothyroidism in Isfahan-Iran. J Med Screen 2009;16:11–6.
19. Hashemipour M, Ghasemi M, Hovsepian S, Heiydari K, Sajadi A, Hadian R, et al. Etiology of congenital hypothyroidism in Isfahan: does it different? Adv Biomed Res 2014;3:21.
20. De Sanctis V, Elhakim IZ, Soliman AT, Elsedfy H, Elalaily R, Millimaggi G. Methods for rating sexual development in girls. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2016;14:27–32.
21. Kato S, Ashizawa K, Satoh K. An examination of the definition 'final height' for practical use. Ann Hum Biol 1998;25:263–70.
22. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Takaishi M. Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. II. Arch Dis Child 1966;41:613–35.
23. Dickerman Z, De Vries L. Prepubertal and pubertal growth, timing and duration of puberty and attained adult height in patients with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) detected by the neonatal screening programme for CH--a longitudinal study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1997;47:649–54.
24. Esposito A, Vigone MC, Polizzi M, Wasniewska MG, Cassio A, Mussa A, et al. Effect of initial levothyroxine dose on neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes in children with congenital hypothyroidism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022;13:923448.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

The z-scores of heights at puberty onset and menarche and of final height (FH) in a healthy population and patients with congenital hypothyroidism.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the congenital hypothyroidism patients

Variable Adolescent girls with CH (n=207)
Birth weight (g) 3,335.66±501.18
Birth height (cm) 50.63±2.73
Head circumference at birth (cm) 36.03±2.58
Filter TSH at diagnosis (IU/L) 40.72±15.73
Serum TSH at diagnosis (IU/L) 79.33±23.38
Age of treatment initiation (day) 18.90±15.20
Levothyroxine dose (mIU/L) 36.84±14.46
Mother's height (cm) 161.78±6.53
Father's height (cm) 173.71±7.76
Classification of age at treatment initiation
 Appropriate 118 (58.7)
 Acceptable 75 (37.3)
 Delayed 8 (4.0)
Parental consanguinity 73 (38.6)
Parental consanguinity degree
 First degree 42 (57.5)
 Second degree 31 (42.5)
TSH>10 IU/L during the first 6 months of life
 None 44 (21.2)
 1 Time 105 (50.5)
 2 Times 48 (23.1)
 3 Times 11 (5.3)
 4 Times 0 (0)
TSH>10 IU/L during the second 6 months of life
 None 165 (79.3)
 1 Time 34 (16.3)
 2 Times 7 (3.4)
 3 Times 2 (1)
 4 Times 0 (0)
TSH>10 IU/L during the second year of life
 None 162 (77.9)
 1 Time 33 (15.9)
 2 Times 13 (6.3)
 3 Times 0 (0)
 4 Times 0 (0)
TSH>10 IU/L during the third year of life
 None 110 (52.9)
 1 Time 73 (35.1)
 2 Times 18 (8.7)
 3 Times 6 (2.9)
 4 Times 1 (0.5)
Etiology of CH
 Dyshormonogenesis 126 (67)
 Dysgenesis 69 (33)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

CH, congenital hypothyroidism; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Table 2.

Mean±standard deviation of age and height at puberty onset, age and height at menarche, and final height in female congenital hypothyroidism patients and healthy girls

Variable Adolescent girls with CH (n=207) Healthy adolescent girls (n=598) P-value
Age at puberty onset (yr) 10.76±1.41 9.64±1.26 <0.001
Age at menarche (yr) 12.20±1.32 11.87±1.37 0.02
Height at puberty onset (cm) 141.78±8.71 139.50±7.44 0.10
Height at menarche (cm) 153.89±7.53 153.16±5.73 0.40
Final height (cm) 160.28±8.43 160.29±5.34 0.99

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

CH, congenital hypothyroidism.

Table 3.

The correlation coefficients of age at menarche and final height SDS with screening-related variables in patients with congenital hypothyroidism

Variable FH z-score Age at menarche Age at puberty onset
Birth weight (g) 0.355* -0.060 0.144
Birth height (cm) 0.122 -0.048 0.182
Head circumference at birth (cm) 0.149 -0.112 0.087
Filter paper TSH level at diagnosis (IU/L) 0.096 0.093 -0.167
Serum TSH at diagnosis (IU/L) 0.121 0.180 -0.018
Age of treatment initiation (day) 0.034 0.127 0.149
Levothyroxine dose (mIU/L) −0.054 0.153 0.017
TSH level during the first 6 months of life (IU/L) 0.024 0.104 0.017
TSH level during the second 6 months of life (IU/L) −0.086 0.302 0.291
TSH level during the second year of life (IU/L) −0.031 −0.072 0.089
TSH level during the third year of life (IU/L) −0.037 0.113 0.058
Levothyroxine dosage at the first year of life (mIU/L) 0.158 −0.010 -0.228
Levothyroxine dosage at the second year of life (mIU/L) 0.116 0.055 -0.123
Levothyroxine dosage at the third year of life (mIU/L) 0.175 0.004 -0.038
FH z-score - 0.690* 0.600*
Age at menarche - - 0.175
Age at puberty onset - - -

SDS, standard deviation score; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

*

P-value, statistically significant differences.

Table 4.

Characteristics of patients with congenital hypothyroidism (CH) regarding final height (FH) relative to target height (TH)

Variable CH patients with FH≥TH CH patients with FH<TH P-value
Birth weight (g) 3.335.53±474.72 3.322.62±488.91 0.776
Birth height (cm) 51.79±2.89 50.93±2.88 0.240
Head circumference at birth (cm) 36.45±2.36 36.17±1.67 0.936
Filter TSH at diagnosis (IU/L) 71.22±117.32 38.18±46.92 0.073
Serum TSH at diagnosis (IU/L) 72.78±71.84 63.86±47.96 0.855
Age of treatment initiation (day) 18.90±17.70 19.07±17.02 0.591
Levothyroxine dose (mIU/L) 36.95±14.25 39.52±12.68 0.123
Classification of age at treatment initiation 0.794
 Appropriate 31 (63.3) 26 (56.5)
 Acceptable 16 (32.7) 18 (39.1)
 Delayed 2 (4.1) 2 (4.3)
Parental consanguinity degree 0.246
 First degree 26 (65) 26 (61.9)
 Second degree 14 (35) 16 (38.1)
TSH>10 IU/L during the first 6 months of life 0.139
 None 19 (35.8) 16 (33.3)
 1 Time 18 (34) 23 (47.9)
 2 Times 15 (28.3) 6 (12.5)
 3 Times 1 (1.9) 3 (6.3)
 4 Times - -
TSH>10 IU/L during the second 6 months of life 0.483
 None 43 (81.1) 37 (77.1)
 1 Time 9 (17) 7 (14.6)
 2 Times 1 (1.9) 3 (6.3)
 3 Times - 1 (2.1)
 4 Times - -
TSH>10 IU/L during the second year of life 0.881
 None 41 (77.4) 45 (81.3)
 1 Time 9 (17) 7 (14.6)
 2 Times 3 (5.7) 3 (4.2)
 3 Times - -
 4 Times - -
TSH>10 IU/L during the third year of life 0.371
 None 31 (58.5) 27 (56.3)
 1 Time 17 (32.1) 11 (22.9)
 2 Times 4 (7.5) 7 (14.6)
 3 Times 1 (1.9) 3 (6.3)
 4 Times - -
Etiology of CH 0.276
 Dyshormonogenesis 28 (58.3) 28 (66.7)
 Dysgenesis 20 (41.7) 14 (33.3)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).